Legal Counsel Opinions. Upon the request of the Buyer from to time to time, the Company shall be responsible (at its cost) for promptly supplying to the Company’s transfer agent and the Buyer a customary legal opinion letter of its counsel (the “Legal Counsel Opinion”) to the effect that the sale of Commitment Shares and Conversion Shares by the Buyer or its affiliates, successors and assigns is exempt from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act pursuant to Rule 144 (provided the requirements of Rule 144 are satisfied and provided the Commitment Shares and Conversion Shares are not then registered under the 1933 Act for resale pursuant to an effective registration statement). Should the Company’s legal counsel fail for any reason to issue the Legal Counsel Opinion, the Buyer may (at the Company’s cost) secure another legal counsel to issue the Legal Counsel Opinion, and the Company will instruct its transfer agent to accept such opinion.

The Executive expressly warrants and agrees s/he has been supplied with, has read and has been advised by [[Organization A:Organization]], if he/she so desires, to discuss the terms of this Agreement with his/her own legal counsel or anyone else he or she chooses. The Executive further warrants and agrees that s/he fully understands the contents and effect of this document, approves and voluntarily accepts the terms and provisions of the Agreement.

Opinion of Counsel. The [[Organization B:Organization]] shall have received a favorable opinion addressed to the [[Organization B:Organization]], dated as of the Effective Date, substantially in the form of Exhibit F attached hereto, from Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, counsel to the [[Organization A:Organization]] and [[Organization C:Organization]] (and the [[Organization A:Organization]] and the [[Organization C:Organization]] instruct such counsel to deliver such opinion to the [[Organization B:Organization]]).

Advice of Counsel. Both parties hereto acknowledge that they have had the advice of counsel before entering into this Agreement, have fully read this Agreement and understand the meaning and import of all the terms hereof.

Opinions of Counsel. A favorable opinion of Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, legal counsel to Borrower and Guarantors, as to such matters as Administrative Agent may reasonably request, as to such matters as Administrative Agent may reasonably request;

Opinion of Counsel. In the event that an opinion of counsel is needed for any matter related to this Note, the Investor has the right to have any such opinion provided by its counsel. Investor also has the right to have any such opinion provided by Issuer's counsel.

Consultation with Counsel. Executive acknowledges that, prior to assenting to the terms of this Agreement, he has been given a reasonable time to review it and was advised to consult with counsel of Executive’s choice regarding its contents.

Selection of Counsel. In the event the Company shall be obligated hereunder to pay the Expenses of any Claim, the Company shall be entitled to assume the defense of such Claim, with legal counsel reasonably approved by the Indemnitee, upon the delivery to the Indemnitee of written notice of its election to do so. After delivery of such notice, approval of such legal counsel by the Indemnitee and the retention of such legal counsel by the Company, the Company will not be liable to the Indemnitee under this Agreement for any fees of counsel subsequently incurred by the Indemnitee with respect to the same Claim; provided that, # the Indemnitee shall have the right to employ the Indemnitee’s legal counsel in any such Claim at the Indemnitee’s expense; # the Indemnitee shall have the right to employ its own legal counsel in connection with any such proceeding, at the expense of the Company, if such legal counsel serves in a review, observer, advice and counseling capacity and does not otherwise materially control or participate in the defense of such proceeding; and # if # the employment of legal counsel by the Indemnitee has been previously authorized by the Company, # the Indemnitee shall have reasonably concluded that there is a conflict of interest between the Company and the Indemnitee in the conduct of any such defense, or # the Company shall not in fact continue to retain such legal counsel to defend such Claim, then the fees and expenses of the Indemnitee’s legal counsel shall be at the expense of the Company.

Company Counsel Opinion. The opinion and negative assurance letter of Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP, counsel to the Company and the Guarantors organized in Delaware and Tennessee, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the Initial Purchasers, substantially in the form of Exhibit A-11] attached hereto and # the opinion and negative assurance letter of Stephenson Harwood LLP, United Kingdom counsel to the Company, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the Initial Purchasers, substantially in the form of Exhibit A-22] attached hereto.

Local Counsel Opinions. The opinion of # Dover Dixon Horne PLLC, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Arkansas, # Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Arizona and New Mexico, (c)Austin Stewart, Esq., counsel to the Guarantors organized in California, # Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., counsel to the Guarantors organized in Florida, # Sanders, Ranck & Skilling, P.C., counsel to the Guarantors organized in Georgia, # Frost Brown Todd LLC, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Indiana, Virginia and West Virginia, # Polsinelli PC, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Kansas, # Verrill Dana LLP, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Maine and Rhode Island, # Locke Lord LLP, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Massachusetts, # Jones Walker LLP, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Mississippi and Louisiana, # Husch Blackwell LLP, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Missouri, # Karell Dyre Haney PLLP, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Montana, # Ice Miller LLP, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Ohio, # McAfee & Taft A Professional Corporation, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Oklahoma, # Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Oregon, # Meyer, Unkovic & Scott LLP, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Pennsylvania, # Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, counsel to the Guarantors organized in South Carolina, # McGuire, Craddock & Strother, P.C., counsel to the Guarantors organized in Texas, # Holland & Hart LLP, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Utah, and # Lindquist & Vennum LLP, counsel to the Guarantors organized in Wisconsin, in each case, dated the Closing Date, addressed to the Initial Purchasers and in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the Initial Purchasers.